Agencies for International Cooperation in TVET:
A Guide to Sources of Information
 Tools:  Search | Abbreviations | PDF Downloads
Home >> Trends in policies

>>

  Programme-Based Approaches and Basket Funding   <back to top>
  Since the 1990s, policies of Agencies for International Cooperation move more and more towards Programme Based Approaches (PBAs). The purpose is to avoid fragmentation of development assistance, to achieve enhanced coordination of financial means and better cooperation. Also the ownership of development programmes of recipient countries and the support of partners' institutional development are strongly emphasized, which could not be achieved to a satisfactory degree by the project-based approach:

"[A] multiplicity of donor organizations pursued "their own" interventions, paying insufficient attention to intra- and intersectoral issues and to recipient country needs and preferences."[1] This does not mean that there is no support for projects anymore, but rather the embedding of the project approach has changed: "It is the notion of who is leading and who 'owns' the development agenda […]".[2]

The most important approach of programme-based assistance is the Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp). It is characterized by various forms and definitions according to the multiple agencies involved in international cooperation, which also name these approaches in slightly different ways. Individual interpretations by the various donors are mentioned in the respective sections of this guide.

A Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) is

"[…] a process in which funding for the sector - whether internal or from donors - supports a single policy and expenditure programme, under government leadership, and adopting common approaches across the sector. It is generally accompanied by efforts to strengthen government procedures for disbursement and accountability. A SWAp should ideally involve broad stakeholder consultation in the design of a coherent sector programme at micro, meso and macro levels, and strong co-ordination among donors and between donors and government." [3]

The Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) also provides room for funding of projects, where the projects are entirely part of the policy and budget.

Most Agencies for International Cooperation favour programme-based approaches. They are in different stages of adaptation of their respective policies to this modality though.

Agencies for International Cooperation vary in the interpretation of the concept of "ownership". The definitions of "ownership" ranges from (central) government ownership, over the inclusion of local government and/or key elements of civil society to "everyone involved in a given sector". [4]

Together with the idea of SWAp-like approaches goes the concept of Basket Funding (BF), which means joint funding by several donors. It may or it may not be provided in the form of budget support to the recipient government. The budget support (or cash transfer) in turn can be provided either as support to the budget as a whole or as part of a programme or sector.

Prerequisites for the receipt of development assistance under the new aid paradigm are national policy frameworks of good governance and decentralization that have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented.


>>

  Implications for TVET  <back to top>
  The outlined trends in international cooperation - Programme-Based Approaches and Basket Funding -, adopted to work towards the fulfilment of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals, have the following implications for the support of TVET and Skills Development:
  1. There is little investment in TVET and skills development projects as such. This means that TVET and skills development initiatives have to be set in the framework of the agencies' defined priorities, oriented towards the Millennium Development Goals (other than for example primary education, TVET and Skills Development are not mentioned explicitly).
  2. Poverty Reduction Strategies, based on the first principle of the Millennium Development Goals - Poverty Alleviation -, are the dominant paradigm to fulfil this first development goal. The aim of poverty alleviation is thought to be reachable by giving emphases on crosscutting priorities, the Millennium Development goals and targets. Likewise TVET and skills development initiatives need to be shown in their connection to poverty alleviation and its crosscutting priorities.
  3. There is still funding available for projects after the orientation towards Programme Based Approaches. There is the will to embed projects in the local government's programmes considered worthy to be supported due to their relevance in the context of the Millennium Development Goals.

[1] Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://minbuza.nl > English site > Development Cooperation > Sectoral Approach > Further reading > Dossier Sector Wide Approaches, access: 01 March 2003. <back>
[2] Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://minbuza.nl > Development Cooperation > Sectoral Approach > Further reading > Resources > Synthesis report on development agency policies and perspectives on programme-based approaches, access: 1 March 2003, p. 1. <back>
[3] Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://minbuza.nl > Development Cooperation > Sectoral Approach > SWAp Keysheet, access: 1 March 2003. <back>
[4] Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://minbuza.nl > Development Cooperation > Sectoral Approach > Further reading > Resources > Synthesis report on development agency policies and perspectives on programme-based approaches, access: 1 March 2003, p. 4. <back>



 
  This site is provided by the UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre.
If you have any questions, comments or difficulties using this site, please send an email to webmaster@unevoc.unesco.org.